I admit that I’m very un-photogenic. Even my own mother tells me so. “Why do you look so bad in pictures? Practice how to pose in front of the mirror!” Perhaps it’s my natural awkwardness and/or low self-esteem manifesting itself on film. Or maybe I just don’t have the face for it.
Being an artiste, I’ve studied human anatomy and the human form many times (heck I had to stare at naked bodies for 8 hours straight every Saturday for an entire summer). Working in marketing, I sometimes have to pour through hundreds of photos, examining face after face. And I’ve noticed that there are certain features that definitely makes one easier to draw, or more pleasing to the eye when photographed:
- Large eyes with dark, thick lashes
- Small chin on women, large chin on men
- Full, thick lips
- Fairly symmetrical features
This isn’t too surprising. After all, these are the same features that scientists have declared to be what we, as humans, find the most attractive in the opposite sex.
I’m sorry to say that I don’t have any of those features. I have small eyes with non-existent eyelashes, thin lips, and a strong, prominent (masculine) jawline. However, I believe that these features “work” for me. I don’t have classically beautiful features, but I have been described as being “exotic” several times. There have even been instances where strangers have stopped me on the street to tell me that I’m beautiful (and not in a shady, I’m-hitting-on-you way).
Nonetheless, the fact remains that I still don’t photograph well due to these features.
I know a girl (I won’t mention her name lest she gets embarrassed) who is drop-dead gorgeous in real life, and many people agree with me. However, the very features that give her the unforgettable, exotic look (upturned almond-shaped eyes, slightly asymmetrical face) make her look horrible in pictures.
I also know of some people who look fabulous on film (thinner, younger, and generally more attractive) but they don’t look that great in real life. I often find myself comparing their pictures with their real-life-selves and wondering how they could look so good in pictures, even better than they are in real life. And I see that they have the same exact features I’ve outlined above.
There are also those who look exactly the same on film and in person.
Which category do you think you fall under? Are you happy with the way you look on film? Do you think you’re unphotogenic?
Also, if you want to know my opinion of whether I think you’re photogenic, leave me a comment and I’ll let you know.


I like books, gadgets, spicy food, and art. I dislike shopping, hot weather, and the laws of entropy. Although I am a self-proclaimed computer nerd, I still have a love for handbags and makeup... and I am always teetering on high heels. To learn more about me, visit the "About" page.

















I think I’m pretty photogenic, but I definitely feel and look better in person
Note, I need to wear a BIT of makeup to look awake, with brown eye liner and concealer, but other than that, I’m pretty much makeup-free most of the time
I’m my best when I first wake up and my hair is all curly and tousled. I don’t know why that is…
Oh, I am most definitely NOT photogenic! I shy away from cameras and avoid close up pictures. I feel your pain! Even on good days when I think I’m looking pretty good, it never comes through in a photo. I have a strong jaw, lidless Asian eyes with no lashes and an asymmetrical (not to mention halfway receded) hairline. Ah well.. But you, missy, have amazing skin, I’m jealous!
I am very frequently told I am beautiful by random people and I always seem to attract plenty of male attention, but in photographs my face looks like a ruddy potato. I have a round forehead (think kate bosworth) and a very tiny chin, and while my cheekbones look nice in person in pics they look flabby and fat, I always manage to have a double chin, and my bone structure seems non-existant. I also seem to always have puffy looking eyes and huge teeth. Now, I am not just making this up, I am the most unphotogenic person I know. strangely, I look a lot like my uncle, who is very handsome in person, but also photographs hideously. I think it is how our foreheads and chins fail to reflect light in a flattering way. But I have accepted it, thought it would be nice to have a decent picture of me.
This drives me crazy – I think I am very photogenic. I get compliments on photos all the time, but in real life, I'm just eh. I'm plain and a bit frumpy. I wish I looked like I do in photos!
I think I can look good in pictures…if I’m the one taking it, and I have to take at lest 100 shots before I find one that I’m satisfied with.
Overall I tend to stay away from pictures since I’m insecure, and I don’t like the way i come out.
I don’t care much since I never go back and look at old pictures. too lazay
I look slightly better in pictures than in real life but for the most part, I look the same. I have the big eyes, small and narrow chin that you described though I didn’t know these features contributed to one being photogenic. I also have the tendency to look slightly Asian in my pics because of my upturned almond eye shape and people who see my pics think I’m part Asian. What I noticed is that the biggest factor between an average looking pic and a great one is the lighting. I look good in pics taken in natural daylight when it’s overcast outdoors and the camera flash is not needed. Once I use the flash, unflattering shadows are introduced that would otherwise have not been there. I’ve had some rather unflattering pics with the flash because of the shadow issue. Another factor would be the angle of the shot. My best pics are ones taken by someone else where my face is slightly turned to the side.
I find that people with sharp features are naturally photogenic from any angle. The people with a sharp nose and pointy chin.
Also, I’ve noticed that people with flat faces – that is without a rounded forehead and the upper lip space flat (without an overbite teeth) photograph better.
eg. Aishwarya Rai (an Indian model, won Miss World 1994) she is incredibly photogenic and her face has all the above mentioned qualities. Check it out.
http://portraitsfaces.blogspot.com.au/2011_08_01_archive.html
My features are quite soft. My nose isn’t sharp and my nostrils are huge and my teeth lean forward so that my jaw isn’t as defined! But I get compliments all the time but I look awful in photos. Maybe, because photographs are 2 dimensional and features that are sharp stick out more, thus making a face photogenic.
What do you think?
hey dramaqueen, i agree. i noticed that too. flat faces are more photogenic maybe bec they catch light and reflects it more evenly. if a face is protruding, it catches light and it is more intense on the raised areas, like the forehead and upper lip as u say. i really want to experiment by drawing the a face both on a balloon (matte) and then on a flat piece of paper with the same size and shape as the balloon then photograph the two. i havent done it yet so it still remains a theory for me.
I’m highly un-photogenic. I can’t stand 95 % of pictures of me. Basically, I have to be in just the exactly right combination of light and shadow or it really looks not good. But in a mirror I can see I’m a fairly pretty person, and all my life I’ve had people tell me I’m pretty/beautiful. Strange, strange
I’m not photogenic at all. It takes me awhile to find a decent picture. But Lots of people tell me i’m pretty. So sometimes I wonder if they are lying. I think I realized that I just don’t take good pictures. But I really Wanna see what people see that I can’t… I like it this way though because I wouldn’T want to be pretty in pictures and ugly in real life lol.